Farient Advisors | Executive Compensation Consultants

  • What We Do
    • Executive Compensation
    • Boards of Directors' Compensation
    • Pay for Performance Alignment
  • Who We Serve
    • Public Companies
    • Private Companies
    • Transaction Services
    • Institutional Investors
  • Why Choose Farient
    • Our Business Philosophy
    • Our Approach
    • Case Studies
    • Farient's 5-P's
    • Proprietary Methodologies
  • Key Issues
    • Blog
    • Regulatory, Shareholder and Market Updates
    • Pay for Performance Alignment
    • Goal Setting
    • Short-Term Gain, Long-Term Pain
    • Risk
    • Compensation Strategies
    • Compensation Committee Process
    • Managing Equity
    • Investor Perspective on Exec. Pay
    • Succession Planning and Exec. Pay
  • Media Center
    • Archive
  • Learn More
    • Contact Us
    • Our Team
    • Our Services
    • Join our Team
Farient executive compensation issues

Goal Setting

Why is goal setting so hard?

The Issue

People often have a hard time setting goals, and often, after performance has happened, they don’t like the goals they set.  In retrospect, they often were too easy, or too hard, or didn’t measure the right things.

Farient’s Point of View

Farient believes that of all the design features of compensation, goal setting has one of the most significant effects on alignment.  Goal setting is all about striking the right balance between establishing measures and setting goals that are, at once, motivational to executives and accretive to shareholders. Historically, most companies have tended to set goals relative to a budget that is established from an internal perspective, which we refer to as a “mark- to- budget” approach.  In contrast, we believe that goals also need to be set relative to standards that support stock price increases and create shareholder value over time, which we refer to as a “mark-to-shareholder” approach.

How Farient Can Help

We routinely work with our clients to sharpen their philosophies and processes around goal-setting.  To drive philosophical resolution, we help our clients define what constitutes good (or poor) performance – achievement against internally-driven goals, externally-driven benchmarks, or year over year improvement.  We then put a fact-base around all of the goal-setting inputs, including our client’s strategic and financial plan, historical and projected performance for our client and its peers, goal levels used by the peers, and shareholder expectations as indicated by analyst expectations as well as how the stock is valued.  We then consider how to use the entire goal range to infuse both shareholder sensitivity and motivational value into the goal-setting system.  For example, we might use the lower end of the goal range (i.e., between threshold and target) for motivational objectives and goals, and reserve the high end of the goal range (i.e., between target and maximum) for good relative and shareholder accretive performance.

  • Blog
  • Regulatory, Shareholder and Market Updates
  • Investor Perspective on Executive Compensation
  • Pay for Performance Alignment
  • Goal Setting
  • Short-Term Gain, Long-Term Pain
  • Risk
  • Compensation Strategies
  • Succession Planning and Executive Compensation
  • Managing Equity
  • Compensation Committee Process

Get Access to "The Executive Paywatch" newsletter.


Click here to see a sample copy.





When you're responsible for Executive Compensation, this is not where you want to end up.
View all of our ads...

Copyright 2011 - Farient Advisors, LLC

  • |
  • RSS Feed
  • Twitter
Los Angeles Area
201 South Lake Avenue
Suite 804
Pasadena, CA 91101
(626) 656-4000
New York City
55 E. 59th Street
Suite 12B
New York, New York 10022
(646) 626-6930